How can anyone be so perverse, so hateful, so full of self-loathing that they would blame without evidence
any American president for an attack as purely evil as that carried out on September 11th?
Despite Osama bin Laden's videotaped confession and celebration of the crime (transcribed and published by Al Jazeera, which is well-known for its pro-Bush, pro-American, and pro-Conservative Christian biases), some Americans still support the idea that 9/11 was an inside job.
Was President Clinton in on the bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993, Riyadh in '95, the Khobar Towers in '96, our embassies in Kenya and Tanzania in '98, or the U.S.S. Cole in 2000?
How can Muslims celebrate bin Laden's Allah-pleasing victory against the Great Satan if he were not involved?
Why has Osama never said, "Hey, wait a minute! I had nothing to do with 9/11, but even if I did, Bush was in on it!"?
Wouldn't that one declaration have ended the current Crusader/Zionist War Against Islam?
If President Bush really did plan and execute -- or even know of and allow -- the foul deed, why did not John Kerry call him on it during the 2004 campaign? He'd be President Kerry now (and unlike our current Economist-In-Chief, getting credit for "keeping the nation strong in tough economic times").
Senator Kerry didn't mind slandering his fellow servicemen in harm's way during the Vietnam War to advance his own career then; I doubt he'd mind exposing the truth about the worst mass-murderer in American history now. (And a Republican one at that, though for those twisted enough to believe the President had something to do with 9/11, the difference is one of semantics only.)
Here's John Kerry vowing to "destroy" OBL. Why bin Laden, if Bush is guilty of the blood of those three thousand?
According to Al Jazeera:
In a statement, Kerry said he will do whatever it takes to capture or kill "terrorists".
"In response to this tape of Usama bin Ladin, let me just make it clear, crystal clear, as Americans we are united in our determination to hunt down and destroy Usama bin Ladin and the terrorists," Kerry said.
If President Bush really had something to do with 9/11, why has not the Democrat-controlled House impeached him? Why does no rational human being -- even liberal Democrat politicians -- make that argument?
The best that the Rabid Socialist and her (now overtly) Racist Rabid Socialist opponent can come up with is criticism of the War in Iraq, but the Administration has always denied a direct connection between Saddam Hussein and September 11th.
After 9/11, everyone -- even the most hateful, liberal bigots, and then out of fear -- united behind President Bush. After a year or two of no other major attacks, many of those worms crawled out from under their rocks and attacked the President for political gain and out of malice. Of those, not a few wrote books to cash in on their treasonous derangement. Who among them ever said, "By the way, this is what I did to carry out 9/11, and I did it at the President's request"?
The truth is, everyone without an overwhelming compulsion to lie (and even many with one, like Democratic presidential candidates) finds it impossible to advance the absurd notion that President Bush had anything to do with 9/11.
Of course, irrefutable evidence of responsibility for the single greatest slaughter of American civilians (to date) comes directly from bin Laden himself. Just like his "Ideal Man" and prophet, OBL can't help but brag about that of which he should be utterly ashamed, that which makes him uniquely depraved and vile.
Here is the Caliph-In-Waiting in his own words, translated from the original Black Speech of Mordor into English.
(Has anyone else noticed that Arabic is starting to sound a lot like German? Every time I hear the latter spoken I can't help but think of
Life is Beautiful,
Schindler's List, or
The Sound of Music -- and I don't mean the happy parts. I suppose that genocidal, anti-Semitic, totalitarian ideologies do that to the languages in which they are expressed. Two perfectly-good tongues with historic ties to Christianity ruined now.)
Notice he casts his terrorism in terms of defense of Islam and its adherents (I suppose the only people who can kill innocent women and children are Muslims.
Selfish!). Note also that he plagiarizes Michael Moore, which is both poetic justice and a warning to the Blame America Firsters:
You're in harmony with a monster:
But I am amazed at you [the American people]. Even though we are in the fourth year after the events of September 11th, Bush is still engaged in distortion, deception and hiding from you the real causes. And thus, the reasons are still there for a repeat of what occurred.
So I shall talk to you about the story behind those events and shall tell you truthfully about the moments in which the decision was taken, for you to consider.
I say to you, Allah knows that it had never occurred to us to strike the towers. But after it became unbearable and we witnessed the oppression and tyranny of the American/Israeli coalition against our people in Palestine and Lebanon, it came to my mind.
The events that affected my soul in a direct way started in 1982 when America permitted the Israelis to invade Lebanon and the American Sixth Fleet helped them in that. This bombardment began and many were killed and injured and others were terrorised and displaced.
I couldn't forget those moving scenes, blood and severed limbs, women and children sprawled everywhere. Houses destroyed along with their occupants and high rises demolished over their residents, rockets raining down on our home without mercy.
The situation was like a crocodile meeting a helpless child, powerless except for his screams. Does the crocodile understand a conversation that doesn't include a weapon? And the whole world saw and heard but it didn't respond.
In those difficult moments many hard-to-describe ideas bubbled in my soul, but in the end they produced an intense feeling of rejection of tyranny, and gave birth to a strong resolve to punish the oppressors.
And as I looked at those demolished towers in Lebanon, it entered my mind that we should punish the oppressor in kind and that we should destroy towers in America in order that they taste some of what we tasted and so that they be deterred from killing our women and children.
And that day, it was confirmed to me that oppression and the intentional killing of innocent women and children is a deliberate American policy. Destruction is freedom and democracy, while resistance is terrorism and intolerance.
This means the oppressing and embargoing to death of millions as Bush Sr did in Iraq in the greatest mass slaughter of children mankind has ever known, and it means the throwing of millions of pounds of bombs and explosives at millions of children - also in Iraq - as Bush Jr did, in order to remove an old agent and replace him with a new puppet to assist in the pilfering of Iraq's oil and other outrages.
So with these images and their like as their background, the events of September 11th came as a reply to those great wrongs, should a man be blamed for defending his sanctuary?
Is defending oneself and punishing the aggressor in kind, objectionable terrorism? If it is such, then it is unavoidable for us.
This is the message which I sought to communicate to you in word and deed, repeatedly, for years before September 11th.
And you can read this, if you wish, in my interview with Scott in Time Magazine in 1996, or with Peter Arnett on CNN in 1997, or my meeting with John Weiner in 1998.
You can observe it practically, if you wish, in Kenya and Tanzania and in Aden. . . . .
[. . .]
So we are continuing this policy in bleeding America to the point of bankruptcy. Allah willing, and nothing is too great for Allah.
That being said, those who say that al-Qaida has won against the administration in the White House or that the administration has lost in this war have not been precise, because when one scrutinises the results, one cannot say that al-Qaida is the sole factor in achieving those spectacular gains.
Rather, the policy of the White House that demands the opening of war fronts to keep busy their various corporations - whether they be working in the field of arms or oil or reconstruction - has helped al-Qaida to achieve these enormous results.
And so it has appeared to some analysts and diplomats that the White House and us are playing as one team towards the economic goals of the United States, even if the intentions differ.
[. . .]
It is true that this shows that al-Qaida has gained, but on the other hand, it shows that the Bush administration has also gained, something of which anyone who looks at the size of the contracts acquired by the shady Bush administration-linked mega-corporations, like Halliburton and its kind, will be convinced. And it all shows that the real loser is ... you.
. . . for the record, we had agreed with the Commander-General Muhammad Ataa, Allah have mercy on him, that all the operations should be carried out within 20 minutes, before Bush and his administration notice.
[. . .]
In conclusion, I tell you in truth, that your security is not in the hands of Kerry, nor Bush, nor al-Qaida. No.
Your security is in your own hands. And every state that doesn't play with our security has automatically guaranteed its own security.
And Allah is our Guardian and Helper, while you have no Guardian or Helper. All peace be upon he who follows the Guidance.
My help is in YHWH, Who made heaven and earth.
