Wednesday, September 30, 2009

Non-Muslims defending Islam demonstrate neither their enlightenment nor tolerance, but their suicidal ignorance

It's like a Jew in 1943 arguing that Hitler's "just like you and me."

Offered to some enlightened individuals posting in defense of multiculturalism and their own self-satisfying sense of moral superiority here:
Why do so many of you here defend "sacralized" genocide? Pedophilia? Mutilation? Rape? Slavery? Extortion? Deceit? Religious and gender apartheid? Murderous anti-Semitism?

For when you ignorantly and blithely vomit lies like, "Christians are just as bad," and, "racist!" you do so in defense of the most hateful ideology in the history of Man.

It is true that there are "bad apples" in every group, but that is not the issue with regard to Islam, for in the case of Muhammad's "religion," his apples are commanded by their god and prophet to enslave or slaughter all who refuse the "invitation" to Allah's barrel.

Rather than demonize those actually defending your Life and Liberty, educate yourselves. Choose the right side of this argument.

For fourteen hundred years, Muslims have enslaved, raped, and slaughtered in obedience to Allah's command and in accord with Muhammad's example:
"fight and slay the Pagans wherever ye find them, and seize them, beleaguer them, and lie in wait for them in every stratagem (of war) . . . " (Qur’an 9:5).

"The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old” (Tabari 9:131).

"The punishment of those who wage war against Allah and His Messenger, and strive with might and main for mischief through the land is: execution, or crucifixion, or the cutting off of hands and feet from opposite sides, or exile from the land: that is their disgrace in this world, and a heavy punishment is theirs in the Hereafter . . . " (Qur'an 5:33).
[Ibn Kathir says of this verse: "'Wage war' mentioned here means, oppose and contradict, and it includes disbelief, blocking roads and spreading fear in the fairways. Mischief in the land refers to various types of evil." So, Muhammad requires execution, crucifixion, or cutting off hands and feet from opposite sides for "disbelief."]

And there are many other such passages.

Please, abandon your suicidal ignorance, inform yourselves, and defend our God-given rights while we still have time.
[. . .]
By the way, how can you have a reasonable expectation of trustworthiness from someone whose god teaches:
"War is deceit" (Bukhari Volume 4, Book 52, Number 268).

"Let not the believers take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah" (Qur'an 3:28).
Post scriptum:

If you scan the comments, you'll notice someone arguing in defense of Obama claiming that, "Obama is a Muslim.

I thought only Islamophobes said things like that.

What's next?

Someone will say that Obama's middle name is "Hussein"?  That he demands we respect Islam?  That he bowed to the tyrant of Dar al-Islam?  That he's abandoned Israel and other good allies but supports Terrorists with Nukes and Third-World, Tin-pot Dictators?

Sunday, September 27, 2009

For all those who don't believe that any decent world religion could exalt child rape, you're absolutely right

Which is why unspeakable depravity such as that detailed below can occur only in Islam.

It occurs because Allah ordained Muhammad's raping little, prepubescent Aisha:
"My mother came to me while I was being swung on a swing between two branches and got me down. My nurse took over and wiped my face with some water and started leading me. When I was at the door she stopped so I could catch my breath. I was brought in while Muhammad was sitting on a bed in our house. My mother made me sit on his lap. The other men and women got up and left. The Prophet consummated his marriage with me in my house when I was nine years old” (Tabari 9:131).

"Narrated 'Aisha [Mohammed's six-year-old "bride" and nine-year-old sexual "partner"]: 'Allah's Apostle said (to me), "You were shown to me twice in (my) dream [before I married you]. Behold, a man was carrying you in a silken piece of cloth and said to me, 'She is your wife, so uncover her,' and behold, it was you. I would then say (to myself), 'If this is from Allah, then it must happen.'"'" (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 87, Number 139 and 140).
Sunnis can try to escape blame by scapegoating Shiites ("it's not us!"), but Sunni Islam is just as guilty of "sacralizing" child rape as the Ayatollah-in-hell.

From here:
"'A man can marry a girl younger than nine years of age even if the girl is still a baby being breastfed. A man however is prohibited from having intercourse with a girl younger than nine other sexual act such as forplay rubbing kissing and sodomy is allowed. A man having intercourse with a girl younger than nine years of age has not comitted a crime but only an infraction if the girl is not permanently damaged. If the girl however is permanently damaged the man must provide for her all her life. But this girl will not count as one of the man s four permanent wives. He also is not permitted to marry the girl[']s sister.'"
Speaking of 'Umdat al-Salik:
"There is no doubt that this translation is a valuable and important work, whether as a textbook for teaching Islamic jurisprudence to English speakers, or as a legal reference for use by scholars, educated laymen, and students in this language." Dr. Taha Jabir al-'Alwani, International Institute of Islamic Thought (Herndon, VA; December 1990)

"...We certify that this translation corresponds to the Arabic original and conforms to the practice and faith of the orthodox Sunni community (Ahl al-Sunnah wa al-Jama'a)." al-Azhar, the Muslim world's most prestigious institution of higher Islamic learning (Cairo; February, 1991).

Saturday, September 26, 2009

Only real American generosity can end the threat of Islamophobia-induced resistance

We have been too self-centered.

Too xenophobic.

Too fascist, too racist, too Euro-centric.

America needs to look beyond itself and consider how others view the world.

We need to stop assuming that everyone else thinks the way we do.

I propose that, instead of trying to fit others into our pathetic, self-absorbed, can't-see-past-who's-left-on-American-Idol, little box, we try to see things as they do, especially those who seek to harm us for what many of our more-enlightened and clearly-more-sophisticated betters tell us are legitimate grievances.

I've begun to do just that.

Over the last several years I've been really listening -- without preconditions -- to what those obviously-innocent adherents of the Great World Religion -- victims of capitalist, racist, American prejudice -- are saying.

You know what I've discovered?

America is stingy.  If we want peace with others, if we want to regain the world's respect and rebuild bridges, if want to lead the world into a more peaceful future, we need to start giving people what they really want, not what we think is necessary.

Consider the facts:
-We've offered up only a few thousand of our best and bravest in protecting "innocent" "South Asian" lives.

-Despite America's vast wealth, we've withheld all but around a trillion in treasure trying to win the hearts and minds of "youths," the "poor," the "non-integrated," the "disenfranchised," and the "oppressed."

-We've only recently elected to the leadership of our nation someone who is clearly more understanding of Muslim sensibilities than anyone who's never been a Muslim could be.
(His mild-to-moderate anti-Semitism?  Yes, 1930's Germany did better, but Europe is always ahead of us.  Give the guy a break!  You can't expect perfection after only a few months on the job.)
To enhance this new-and-improved worldview (as someone perceptively pointed out to me once, I need to walk in someone else's moccasins before I can judge them!) I've been studying the texts, tenets, and history of those currently fighting the global Zionist/Crusader conspiracy against Muslims.

Now I see clearly:
It's my fault for resisting the rape, enslavement, mutilation, and slaughter of non-Muslims, apostates, women, and little girls.

It's my fault for denying two basic, self-evident truths: I am "the worst of creatures," and Muslims are "the best of people" who deserve my total subjugation and humiliation.
I know!  How narrow-minded and bigoted I've been!

So, what can we do?  How can America atone for its willful blindness?

I propose that we give those who want to kill us what they really want.

A Muslim's ultimate goal is paradise, and I've found one certain way to give that to them.

In Qur'an 9:111 (only a fearful hatemonger would see 9/11 in that citation, racist!), Allah promises eternal bliss -- including dozens of perpetual virgins and boys "like pearls" -- to those who kill and are killed for him.

What more expedient, more efficient, more generous way to help as many Muslims as possible realize their ultimate dream, their hearts' deepest desire, than to give to Mecca and Medina the same "travel package" we gave to Hiroshima and Nagasaki?  (We would have given the same to Berlin if Hitler and his freedom fighters had held out a little longer; if you doubt that, then you must be unaware of what Dresden received.)

We can give sufficient advanced notice so that only the most devout, the most zealous, the most righteous Muslims get to cash in on Allah's guarantee; those apostates who want to stay here and collude with the Zionists and Crusaders will have time to flee.

It's a win-win situation.

We get to make up for past sins, Muslims of conscience can be free of Islam, and the devout get their cosmic brothel (though I don't think it will be exactly what they expected).

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Seventy-eight percent of Muslims in Pakistan Islamophobic . . . the other 22% thought the poll was part of the Zionist-Crusader conspiracy to defame Islam

Since everyone knows that only racist, fear-mongering fascists claim that Islam requires violence.

No, Rifqa Bary is in no danger at all. Though everyone conspiring to return her to her to Ohio will share responsibility for her murder if her parents or their coreligionists are successful in fulfilling the commands of Allah and its monster Muhammad.

More "moderate" Islam, this time from Pakistan where, according to Andrew Bostom, a recent survey shows that 78% of one nation receiving our billions support death for apostates.

They also happen to support burying women alive for "honor."

Here's why:
"A manual of Islamic law certified by Al-Azhar as a reliable guide to Sunni orthodoxy says that 'retaliation is obligatory against anyone who kills a human being purely intentionally and without right.' However, 'not subject to retaliation' is 'a father or mother (or their fathers or mothers) for killing their offspring, or offspring's offspring.' ('Umdat al-Salik o1.1-2)."

Tuesday, September 15, 2009

Calvin a spiritual successor to Muhammad

I knew it!

Not only the conflating of destiny and omniscience, which in Calvin's case destroys men's souls by making the only Savior into a capricious monster, but other expressions of Islamic barbarism had to have warped the Christian culture it oppressed for centuries.  One institution completely alien to the Scriptures -- but in line with Allah's malevolence -- was the Spanish Inquisition.

Though its evils have been exaggerated by those with an axe to grind against Christianity and Roman Catholicism, and though it was government that did the dirty work, the idea that people should be punished temporally for belief is foreign to the New Testament texts, but inherent to Islam's.

Bad theology always causes problems.

On Muhammad's influence on Calvin, from the great Diana West:
One of the most fascinating essays I've ever read about Islam in all these many years since 9/11 (when I first started reading essays about islam) is in the essential book, The Legacy of Jihad, by Andrew G. Bostom.

It is by the French theologian Jacques Ellul and it is called "The Influence of Islam." The essay discusses the influence of Islam on Christianity -- namely, what was "imported into Europe" from Islam that took root in Christianity.

Among other things, Elllul links the elevation of canonical law, the entrenchment of the divine right of kings, and the emergence of "holy war" as evidence of what he notes was a one-way cultural exchange propelled by contact, competition and war with Islam. Islamic influence was an import into Christendom, but there was no reciprocal export of Christian influence into Islam.
Another aspect of this influence that I remember being quite struck by when I first read the essay some years ago had to do with the emergence of Christian notions of "providence," which, as Ellul writes "is never a biblical word" or concept, but was helped into Christian doctrine by the Islamic concept of submission, particularly the Muslim formulation mektoub, "It was written." He writes:
From now on destiny and divine omniscience are conjoined. Believers can live in perfect peace because they know that everything was written in advance. The very formula "It was written" could only come from a religion of the book. Yet the Hebrew Bible and the Gospels never use such a formula. Thanks to it, the idea of predestination that was already haunting philosophical and Christian thinking received confirmation, forcibly established itself, and came to include double predestination (in Calvin), which, whether we want it or not, transforms the biblical God into destiny, Anamke, etc. And this derives from Muslim thinking.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Did Nancy Pelosi admit Obama's ineligibility to serve as president?

WND has more evidence of Obama's failing to satisfy the Constitution's citizenship requirements for the presidency.

Two documents with Pelosi's signature. The second "form obtained by Williams appears identical, although the signatures are different, including the same strategic typographical error. But in this one, the verification of eligibility under the requirements of the U.S. Constitution is gone."


Are there no depths to which Liberals will sink in order to achieve and maintain power?

Friday, September 11, 2009

Remembering 9/11*

While it is fitting and proper that we should remember those who fell on 9/11 and their families and continue to support our political, law enforcement, and military personnel who work to defend us, to continue to lie about or deny why the attack occurred is suicidal.

The command of Allah and the example of Muhammad require the faithful to use [any] means necessary, including violence, to establish the rule of Allah over all mankind (see for yourself here).

Muhammad offered non-Muslims three options: Conversion, slavery as dhimmis, or death.

Nowhere do you hear our political, media, or academic elites state this basic fact. Instead, you've got the president of the United States apologizing to Islam (in a "speech" from Al-Azhar University, whose president endorses suicide bombings), bowing to Muslim tyrants (the Saudi king), and negotiating with Islamic terrorists working to secure nukes (Iran), all while abandoning the only decent, free nation in that part of the world, Israel.

Islamic tyranny and intimidation must be resisted.

Islamic obfuscation and propaganda must be exposed and dispelled.

It is not racism to evaluate a set of beliefs. It is not phobic to state facts about what a text says. It is not intolerant to expose and condemn genocide, murder, pedophilia, rape, slavery, vandalism, extortion, theft, deceit, and religious and gender discrimination [carried out] in the name of a "god."

Many resources are available on-line. Jihad Watch is highly recommended. [I happen to like this site also.]

Here is just a taste of what Muhammad and his allah intend for you, and whether out of ignorance, cowardice, deceit, or simple human decency, the fact that Muslims you know do not advocate such behavior does nothing to negate what Muhammad [commanded] and practiced:
"kill the pagans wherever you find them" (Qur'an 9:5).

"Fight against . . . the People of the Book [Jews and Christians] . . . until they feel themselves subdued and pay the jizya" (Qur'an 9:29).
Remember 9/11, but not with helpless, limp-wristed, self-indulgent expressions of ignorance and confusion.

Remember 9/11 with an accurate understanding of the enemy, an ancient foe which seeks to devour all that you hold dear.

Remember 9/11 and honor our dead by determining to expose, denounce, and punish all who through ignorance, perversion, malfeasance, or deceit would hamper our efforts at effective self-defense.

Fourteen hundred years of global jihad.

Fourteen thousand terrorist attacks in Allah's name since 9/11 alone.

Innocent victims of Muhammad's bloodlust (and lust) cry out around the world.

What will you do when they want to put your children in the oven?

*Will Obama be eating ice cream, playing golf, or playing the fiddle?

Update 9/12, 12:29 AM: It turns out he was painting a wall and urging interfaith dialogue,
but not for Muslims until after Ramadan.

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Rifqa Bary faces death at hands of own murderous Muslim parents; WFTV pulls the video from YouTube and hides it at their site

This is Islam. Monsters.

Notice the young lady's clear statement: Her parents' devotion requires them to kill her.

"If they love Allah more than me, then they have to do it."

"Religion of Peace! Religion of Peace!"

This is what the Leader of the Free World demands you respect, that to which he bows and apologizes:

Update 9/8/09 5:23 PM: The video is no longer available through YouTube, so I sent the following e-mail to everyone I could find at
Why have you pulled the video of Rifqa Bary's desperate plea for help? She is in fear of her life at the hands of her Muslim parents. The media are quick to air propagandists for jihad like CAIR's agents (CAIR happens to be an unindicted co-conspirator in a federal terrorism funding trial), but you deny the public footage that might save her life? Why are you siding with Islamic terrorism? Why are you aiding the implementation of shari'a, Islamic law, in America? Whose side are you on?
"Whoever changed his Islamic religion, then kill him" (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 84, Number 57). "They long that ye should disbelieve even as they disbelieve, that ye may be upon a level (with them). So choose not friends from them till they forsake their homes in the way of Allah; if they turn back (to enmity) then take them and kill them wherever ye find them, and choose no friend nor helper from among them" (Qur'an 4:89).
Tell the truth. Save Rifqa Bary's life, do not become an accomplice in her honor killing, her murder for apostasy.
To which Craig Mazer, Executive Producer, replied:
I have no idea why you would accuse us of taking down that video. You can still, as always, find it here:
So I responded:
It was removed from, a site with considerably more visibility than yours. When I searched your site for "Rifqa Bary," it did not turn up. Thank you for the link. By the way, attached is a screenshot illustrating my point:
Notice the search results from their site: "Older than 30 days" returned nothing; "Last 30 days" turns up the attempted murderers' obfuscations. Who's serving as an accomplice to Muslim murder at WFTV? Update 7:13 PM: Thanks to Pamela Geller at Atlas Shrugs, here is the video from another source: Link: Rifqa Bary The ads are intrusive, but that's a small price to pay for getting Ms. Bary's story out.
Originally posted 8/18/09 at 3:39 AM

Tuesday, September 01, 2009

A real American

A few million more like this one, and it's game over for the socialists.

And the jihadists.

Discovered at this excellent site.