Wednesday, March 15

Argumentum ad hominem easier (and more gratifying for the craven) than intellectual integrity

In response to a post citing an anti-Barton hit piece nearly verbatim, I left the following comments:
"The Boston piece cited here is full of half-truths, misleading assertions, and ad hominem attacks. Rather than addressing the questions of fact in discrediting Barton's argument, Boston tries to discredit Barton.

Argumentum ad hominem is persuasive only with the easily-deceived and those lacking intellectual integrity. Instead of repeating such attacks here nearly verbatim, it would be better to do some independent research and address the argument itself.

Then again, mocking is easier (and more gratifying) than telling the truth."