"According to the BBC, the University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust said it wanted to look at how to accommodate all religious texts in its hospitals and said it was concerned about Bibles spreading diseases like the superbug MRSA."Originally, the Bibles were considered a health hazard because of an (alleged) inability to sanitize them. It seems they've fixed that.
If the removal of Bibles was to reduce the risk of spreading disease, wouldn't providing more literature increase the risk?
Apparently, they only "dis-ease" with which they are concerned is that which is caused by the word of God.