Reports this week show that B. Hussein's bombing of Libya to help its rebels is aiding Al Qaeda, who have joined them. That's no surprise to anyone who's been paying attention, since when Iranians protested against Islamic rule in Iran and were murdered in the streets, all Obama could muster was "Let's not get involved in others' internal politics. Where's the ice cream?"
Look at the facts: Obama's enforcing suicidal Rules of Engagement in Afghanistan. He's bombing Qaddafi in Libya to help a rebellion supported in word and personnel by Al Qaeda. He supported Mubarak's removal in Egypt, which has given the country to the Muslim Brotherhood; Egypt's Copts have gone from the frying pan and into the fire.
When President Bush was deciding what to do in response to the global jihad, his ignorance of Islam prevented him from recognizing the truth about our enemy, and he erred accordingly. Obama has no similar excuse.
If the "smartest president ever" who was raised Muslim and attended Qur'an classes does everything he can to aid the rise of Islamic rule throughout the lands of Islam, it's no accident.
It's treason.*
*Of course, for it to be treason, the allegedly-former-Muslim-in-Chief would have to have been American at some point.
2 in respondeo:
Sir Amillennialist,
The "incoherence" in the Obama Policy in Libya is: Obama's decision transfer Command & Control to NATO in Brussels!
That should scare the wits out of anyone with military experience; there's an obvious lack of understanding of the role of Commander-In-Chief, with Obama's willingness to hand over that responsibility to any 28-nation coalition!
See our post, April 1st. - reb
___ ___
I have no doubt that Muammar Gahdafi was thrilled when he heard from his muslim brother in the White House that NO US ground troops would enter Libya to kill him.
Muammar can rest easy. All he has to do is dig in for a while and wait for the sandstorm to blow over. Then it's back to the regular slaughter.
Post a Comment