Tuesday, February 28

The immutability of traditional, Qur'anic (not "radical") Islam

The jihadists' reading of Qur'an is not radical, it is traditional because that is the way in which Mohammed himself understood it. Another post at EO:

Gordon,

You are doubtless aware that a great many muslims are better than what a full-bore radical reading of their texts would lead one to expect.

Doubtlessly, I am (which makes me wonder why you feel the need to mention it again).

How do you distinguish between those who are and always will be "better," and those who, under the proper circumstances, will take Allah's incitements to heart?

Neither is the jihadists' reading "radical;" rather it is traditional. Most importantly (for the Infidel), their literal reading is the way in which Qur'an should be taken, as Mohammed demonstrated with his own words and deeds.

Otherewise there would be no major discussion here.

It seems at this point the argument is over whether or not Allah and his (false) prophet require offensive warfare to make the world Islam. They did, they do, and they will, since, as Mohammed declared, Islam cannot change (Bukhari Volume 9, Book 88, Number 174).

I would encourage those who doubt to examine the texts for themselves.