Friday, July 17, 2009

How mendacious Muslim malevolence and intransigent Infidel ignorance combine to prove Sun Tzu not only a brilliant military strategist, but a prophet

Each of these statements applies to our current Overseas Contingency Operation/War on a Tactic.

Sun Tzu on what should be our War of Self-Defense Against Islam:
"It is said that if you know your enemies and know yourself, you will not be imperiled in a hundred battles; if you do not know your enemies but do know yourself, you will win one and lose one; if you do not know your enemies nor yourself, you will be imperiled in every single battle."
Totten, Hewitt, Bush, Obama . . . no one tells the truth about Islam.

And now the OIC, in conjunction with the UN, the United States' Congress, and the "president," will limit and then outlaw not criticism, but exposure, of Allah's command and Muhammad's example.
"It is the rule in war, if ten times the enemy's strength, surround them; if five times, attack them; if double, engage them; if equal, be able to divide them; if fewer, be able to evade them; if weaker, be able to avoid them."
Or take their planes, use them as bombs, cry "Islamophobia!" when someone points out why you did it, and then exploit their ignorance and good will to the tune of thousands more American lives and billions upon billions of our dollars.

And they'll celebrate your holidays. Maybe even hire one of your own to command their military.
"For to win one hundred victories in one hundred battles is not the acme of skill. To subdue the enemy without fighting is the acme of skill."
Something like the Muslim Brotherhood’s “Grand Jihad in eliminating and destroying Western Civilization from within,” perhaps?

Islam's success in America has been delayed by 9/11. If not for that, no one would have noticed until it was too late, just like a lobster in a pot of boiling water.

And don't forget the MB's buddies here in the United States: CAIR and ISNA (both unindicted co-conspirators in a federal terrorism trial), MPAC, Obama, his appointees, the American Library Association . . . .
"What is essential in war is victory, not prolonged operations."
1400 years of jihad, you say?

How long does it take to win hearts and minds, again?

What about dialogue? "Mutual" respect?

Just long enough for them to get a nuke and bleed us dry?

Sun Tzu continues:
"Be extremely subtle, even to the point of formlessness. Be extremely mysterious, even to the point of soundlessness. Thereby you can be the director of the opponent's fate"

and

"If your enemy is secure at all points, be prepared for him. If he is in superior strength, evade him. If your opponent is temperamental, seek to irritate him. Pretend to be weak, that he may grow arrogant. If he is taking his ease, give him no rest. If his forces are united, separate them. If sovereign and subject are in accord, put division between them. Attack him where he is unprepared, appear where you are not expected."
Or get yourself elected as the Great Satan's Commander-in-Chief and take up positions in its government, military, security, academic, and media apparatus.

Muslims would never deceive anyone on religious grounds, right? Right?
Muhammad said, "War is deceit."

Bukhari recorded that Abu Ad-Darda' said, "We smile in the face of some people although our hearts curse them.''

"O ye who believe! Take not the Jews and the Christians for your friends and protectors: They are but friends and protectors to each other. And he amongst you that turns to them (for friendship) is of them. Verily Allah guideth not a people unjust" (Qur'an 5:51).

"Let not the believers take for friends or helpers Unbelievers rather than believers: if any do that, in nothing will there be help from Allah: except by way of precaution, that ye may Guard yourselves from them. But Allah cautions you (To remember) Himself; for the final goal is to Allah" (Qur'an 3:28).
The great military strategist continues:
"Victorious warriors win first and then go to war, while defeated warriors go to war first and then seek to win."
They also go to war without their political, media, and academic "elites" having a clue as to what motivates the enemy.

"Religion of Peace! Religion of Peace!"
"All men can see these tactics whereby I conquer, but what none can see is the strategy out of which victory is evolved."
"Terror" is only a tactic; Islam is the Source and Sustenance of 1400 years of global jihad.
"Treat your men as you would your own beloved sons. And they will follow you into the deepest valley."
Or you can elect a radical, America-hating, former Muslim who kowtows to Islamic tyrants and sends your best and bravest into a war they cannot win without obliterating mountain ranges.
"In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy's country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them."
Da'wa.

Or jihad.

Or bankrupting and disarming the nation. Regardless:
"Say to the Unbelievers, if (now) they desist (from Unbelief), their past would be forgiven them; but if they persist, the punishment of those before them is already (a matter of warning for them). And fight them until there is no more Fitnah (disbelief and polytheism: i.e. worshipping others besides Allah) and the religion (worship) will all be for Allah Alone (in the whole of the world). But if they cease (worshipping others besides Allah), then certainly, Allah is All-Seer of what they do" (Qur'an 8:38; ayah 39 from Noble Qur'an).